Explain a workflow first, then show it as one reusable system with an outcome beyond its boundary. Paper stages build into a production chain and fan out to compact output identities; the complete group shrinks into an enclosure before the final result appears. This 7.8-second scene presents your model of the system without packaging software, running stages or producing the claimed outcome.
What you get
A local generator, editable HyperFrames staged composition and motion/review instructions for a 1920×1080, 30 fps shot. Generate and render a workflow-to-system explanation from your supplied labels.
Up to three stages, three outputs, a system heading and an outcome label. Stage paper objects use required source-1 through source-3 raster slots with bundled defaults; outputs and outcome use functional glyphs.
Stage and arrow construction, output fan-out, a locked-group reduction from 3.40 seconds, a system boundary from 4.10 seconds and an external outcome from 5.30 seconds. The enclosed group and final outcome hold together for the concluding reading.
Four styles keep the same data and choreography: White & Yellow (white-yellow), Charcoal & Lime (charcoal-lime), Paper & Orange (paper-orange), and Black & White (midnight-ice). Semantic style overrides are supported; check contrast after changing them. Dark canvases use a fine grid. Local fonts include Inter, IBM Plex Mono for measurements and ordinals, Smiley Sans and Noto Sans SC. Chinese text selects Smiley Sans automatically, including accompanying Latin text; --zh-font noto-sans-sc selects Noto Sans SC, while --font takes precedence for a supplied font.
Before you choose
Use the system boundary to clarify what belongs inside the repeatable process, then make the external outcome a distinct, supportable claim. A drawn enclosure does not make an untested workflow repeatable in practice.
Good fit
A creator explaining how several repeatable activities and outputs form a larger system.
A short teaching passage needing both the internal chain and a separate external outcome.
A series using consistent source documents, output symbols, system headings and outcome emphasis.
Not for
Packaging an executable workflow, creating a reusable software system or verifying a promised business outcome.
An input-only compaction, many stages, or a topology that must automatically rearrange itself for arbitrary counts.
Automatic full-film editing, generated presenter footage or soundtrack, or copying another creator’s identity and materials.
How to use
You say/creatormotion-diagram-pipeline-package Turn my supplied explanation into a white-yellow B-roll scene using the Pipeline to Packaged Result effect. Use the text, data and media I provide, and ask for any required input that is missing.
Prepare stages, outputs, system and outcome. The scene shows the first three stages and first three outputs. Distinguish intermediate outputs from the external outcome so the enclosing boundary explains something useful rather than simply repeating the same promise.
Reuse the bundled source-N images for an illustrative example or replace active slots through --images MAP.json. Relative paths resolve beside the map; unnamed defaults remain. Every active stage paper requires a raster. Follow the image policy and ensure the material matches the stage label.
Keep stage, output and system wording concise. The default three-stage layout has fixed stage positions and a fixed fan-out origin; if using fewer stages, inspect their apparent connection to the outputs. No presenter or alpha matte is used, and adding extra stages in JSON does not expand the supported layout.
From the extracted package, prepare Node.js 22+, FFmpeg and HyperFrames CLI 0.8.30. Run node scripts/create.mjs --out PROJECT --data CONTENT.json --style white-yellow, substituting another documented palette if wanted. Read the motion specification and image policy before adapting the scene; use semantic --overrides for deliberate style changes.
Inspect the editable project at entry, each motion handoff and final hold, then render with the command printed by the generator. Check the resulting frames for text collisions, correct numbers and readable contrast. Keep at least 1.2 seconds for the final reading when editing, and compare all four palettes with identical content after structural changes. Narration, music and assembly into a longer film remain separate work. Review stage arrivals, output fan-out, group scaling, enclosure and external outcome in actual MP4 frames. Keep source-to-output continuity intact and supporting text at least 24 px. Check the small enclosed labels as well as the large final outcome; a readable wide frame matters more than the success of the generation command.
Requirements and costs
You bring
stages: provide your own content or retain the illustrative default. · outputs: provide your own content or retain the illustrative default. · system: provide your own content or retain the illustrative default. · outcome: provide your own content or retain the illustrative default.
Dependencies
HyperFrames CLI 0.8.30 or compatible — required · Node.js 22 or newer — required · FFmpeg — required
Outside costs
Not collected yet
Tools used
HyperFrames
Publisher testing
v1.0.1 — Claude Code / Claude Desktop / Cowork / Codex / ChatGPT
FAQ
Yes. stages, outputs, system and outcome are JSON inputs, with four palettes and optional semantic overrides. Stage images are replaced separately through source-N slots.
No presenter footage is needed. Stage paper objects use required raster slots with bundled defaults. The output and final-result symbols are editable vector elements.
Yes. Preserve the chain, fan-out, whole-group enclosure and later external outcome. Re-render after changes and inspect connector continuity through the camera reduction.
It creates a video explaining a system you describe. It does not execute production steps, package an application or validate the outcome.
The entire chain and its outputs become one bounded, named system before an external outcome is introduced. Stopping at the first output group would omit that second explanation.
User reviews
—0 reviews
Select a star to share your experience.
No reviews yet. Ratings appear once readers share real experiences.