Citrus Loop Deck

Explain a circular-materials project as a concrete proposal: what to inspect, which intervention to try and how to review it. Citrus Loop Deck combines white modular grids, orange/lime/lavender cards, gray loop motifs and tactile photography. The neighborhood-repair example is fictional; its goals and measurement plan are prompts for your evidence, not proven environmental outcomes.

What you get

  • Twelve optional page roles: index/loop, three notched principles, asymmetric repair case, three-part reuse mosaic, six goal cards, measurement plan, three reasons to explore repair, six-cell implementation grid, three material studies, repair process, two craft perspectives and object-led close. Adapt the sequence and count to your actual brief.
  • A precise modular visual language: white space, dark Helvetica Neue/Arial-style text, fine rules, compact capsules/page numbers, pale-gray sweeping loops and a small square color marker. Tall orange/lavender/lime cards use circular-arrow cutouts; asymmetric photo masks and varied card rows keep a restrained rhythm.
  • Five documented page treatments—white analytical, citrus modular, charcoal photographic, blue-sky material and quiet closing—guide composition, not editor theme switching. Sixteen local catalog photographs cover workshop/repair, material studies, portraits and a stool-led close. Many are topic-specific and should not be recast as proof of a real repair or environmental result.
  • A single offline 1280×720 HTML deck with viewing, thumbnails, notes, editing, presentation mode and print styling. Live text/labels/diagrams stay distinct from placed photography. The ZIP supplies recipes, reference art/catalog and composition/build/media tools; its small generic schema example is not the completed case study.
  • Requested PowerPoint keeps native editable text/notes and separate pictures, while backgrounds, SVG decoration and complex effects are rendered layers. PDF printing gives one 16:9 page per slide. Actual exports and fonts need target-app inspection; native shape editability is not universal.

Before you choose

Test the measurement story before the loop graphics. Readers should know what is proposed, what was observed, who does the work and what evidence will inform the next step. A repaired-object photograph or circular motif should not quietly become a claim of measured environmental benefit.

Good fit

  • A circular-materials or repair team has a bounded proposal, approved facts and an honest review plan.
  • A presenter needs consistent pages for principles, cases, goals, materials, roles and implementation.
  • A creator can provide the audience, sources, message, language and desired slide count rather than rely on example outcomes.

Not for

  • Reproducing source art, wording, branded products, recognizable faces or protected identities.
  • Automatic research, safety/repair-method guidance or verification of environmental and performance claims.
  • A deck whose every decoration/background must stay a native PowerPoint shape, or fictional pilot numbers presented as measured results.

How to use

You say/citrus-loop-deck Create a twelve-page circular-materials and repair-project presentation with clean white layouts and citrus-colored modules.
  1. Provide the topic, audience, key messages, source facts, language and exact slide count. Agree a count from the material and duration if unspecified, including opening/closing unless stated otherwise. Separate proposed scope, goals and measurements from completed findings.

  2. Plan a distinct job per page and select the layouts that support it. In a repair proposal, distinguish the object/condition, intervention, skills/tools, material routes, baseline/follow-up measures and next decision. The six-goal and six-step grids are optional structures, not a requirement to invent six findings.

  3. Choose supplied images first, then suitable catalog reuse, generation only for gaps or new imagery throughout. Reuse is the fallback. Record every slot and result; each pictorial source appears on one page only, and altered crops/colors do not count as new photos. Library count and twelve recipes impose no artwork quota or presentation length.

  4. Check subject-specific catalog assets for workshop, furniture, glass reuse, timber, hardware, repair and craft roles; do not use an illustrative person or scene as actual project evidence. Failed/mismatched slots stay disclosed until resolved. Generate at the kit slot ratios using built-in tools or the FAL helper/FAL_KEY. FAL submissions cost separately and are submitted once, then polled/fetched without automatic paid replacement.

  5. Compose the plan from the kit, replace text/alt/images/icons/data and remove unused example nodes. Use Python 3 for composition/build/static deck checks; optional Node helpers handle imagery. Resolve leftover example strings/unfilled slots and check the exact count. Keep resources inline, with useful image resolution below the package’s 20 MB ceiling.

  6. Inspect every 1280×720 page over local HTTP for grid alignment, notch/mask crops, object visibility, contrast over dark photography, unique images, text bounds and numbering/notes. Check figures are labelled as proposals or actual observations accurately. Exercise editing, block/layout/color changes, notes, undo/redo, Save/reopen and presentation mode.

  7. Deliver the standalone HTML in page view, explaining Edit/E and Save (Cmd/Ctrl+S). Browser recovery is local; Save produces portable changes. Keep interface/content languages independent and use framework CJK/RTL support. Export, check and inspect requested PPTX/PDF separately, qualifying font replacement and rendered decoration. The shared editor has no per-style theme picker.

Requirements and costs

You bring
Presentation topic and audience · Key messages or source material · Desired slide count and language
Dependencies
A browser for presentation and verified print export · Node.js for local validation · A host image generation tool for fresh artwork · Chrome, Chromium or Edge plus Node.js 20 or newer — required only for PowerPoint export
Outside costs
Generating new artwork may incur a separate provider charge. The included original example can be viewed without image generation.
Publisher testing
v1.0.5 — Claude Code / Claude Desktop / Cowork / Codex / ChatGPT

FAQ

User reviews

—0 reviews

Select a star to share your experience.

No reviews yet. Ratings appear once readers share real experiences.

Similar Skills

View all skills